Friday, 02 June 2017 00:00

2017-06-02 Cosmic Vision News - Transcript/Links Featured

Written by
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Cosmic Vision News - June 2, 2017

You can download the broadcast by clicking here.

YouTube Audio:


 CVN PayPal logo


Greetings and blessings to all!

This week’s newscast starts off exploring some of the very sneaky tricks that leaders use to manipulate the opinions of humanity, in their desire to maintain power, while using the media as their weapon of mass distraction.

On May 31st,  RT reported that:  “ On Thursday, Trump decided to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement on climate change, causing an outcry from Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, who signed the landmark deal. Kevin Lewis, Obama’s spokesman, released a statement, criticizing the decision as a job killer.”

In speaking out against the decision, the article also reported that:  “The Indigenous Environmental Network, a collection of Native American activist groups, urged “continued resistance” against the move by Trump.

“Trump is showing us the art of breaking a deal,” IEN executive director Tom BK Goldtooth said Thursday in a press release. “By abandoning the Paris Agreement, this administration will further perpetuate environmental racism and climate injustice against Indigenous peoples experiencing the worst effects of climate change across the globe.”

CLICK TO VIEW  - 31MAY2017 : 'Art of breaking a deal': Trump’s withdrawal from Paris climate accord sparks backlash.

In a third RT article on June 2nd, it was reported that: “  European Commission chief Jean-Claude Juncker has stated that President Donald Trump’s efforts to “untie” America from “international connections” make it hard for Europe to stay on good terms with the US, and are pushing the EU toward China.

“Now that there are signs that the US wants to untie itself from international connections, the relationship with China is becoming more and more important,” Juncker told Politico on Thursday, a day before the EU-China summit.”

Juncker was quoted in the article as having said that:  “ I am not very happy with the idea that we might now work even more closely with China than we are able to do with the Americans,” he said just hours before Trump was expected to announce his decision to pull the US out of the 2015 Paris accord on climate change.  This does not fit into my old worldview.”.

CLICK TO VIEW  - 02JUN2017 : US ‘wants to untie itself’ from world, European Commission chief warns

Reading between the lines, this could be a very loaded statement about the internal battles that are allegedly going on between various global cabal groups at this time.  Juncker is one of the unelected leaders of the EU that has been seeking to keep his power and keep the EU together.  Observe his words that an arrangement with China does not fit his old worldview.  Could this be a hint that if the US is shifting in its policies with the EU, Trump may be forcing the EU to surrender to deals with China, which in turn will allow China to force a different financial paradigm onto Europe?

I am not saying that this is the case, but Juncker’s choice of words is potentially very revealing.   However, this is also the same man who stood up in the European parliament and revealed that there was contact with civilizations of a non-Earth origin.

CLICK TO VIEW - via : Jean-Claude Juncker : " I have met several leaders of other planets “.

It is not my place to tell listeners what to think about this choice.  What I will say however is that we do not all the facts yet.  Unless there is someone out there who has read this agreement from beginning to end, I doubt any among us can really claim to debate this piece of legislation one way or the other.

I have not read the whole document, and I have to be upfront with this.   There were some sources reporting, or possibly speculating that the Paris Accord contained the legal framework for a new financial system.  Assuming this to be true, this adds to some of the confusion surrounding whether or not this choice by Trump is a good one or a poor one.

Without having an understanding of the alleged text in the agreement relating to financial change, I am not in a position to comment one way or the other.

The only hints that many of us have right now as to whether or not this agreement is truly LIFE-honouring or not, is to observe the countries, the organizations and the individuals who support or reject the agreement.

Even this is complicated because the support and/or rejection comes from several perspectives:  there are those who are completely aware of what this document represents; there are those who think they are aware of what this document represents and there are those who have no idea what the document represents.

If we consider the fact that most of the leading nations of the world are controlled by the global cabal, this would represent the G7.  This was formerly known as the G8, until the western group tossed Russia out after the US successfully staged a coup and violent protest in Ukraine and blamed it on Russia.  The G7 supports the Paris Accord, but now Trump does not, and yet there are certain factions against Trump in the US that support the document.  One would be wise to ask why?

Environmentalists, including indigenous groups, are criticizing Trump for pulling out, because they believe this represents harm to the planet.  On the surface, they might have a good argument.  Trump has allegedly said that he supported the coal industry. This would fuel..pardon the pun.. this would fuel the argument that Trump is anti-environment.

Here is where things get a little bit confusing, and this appears to be part of Trump’s strategy; to keep people guessing through things he says and does.  This is also why I have to keep reminding listeners to not trust everything I say and use your own discernment.   RT quoted Trump as saying that: “In order to fulfill my solemn duty to protect America and its citizens, the US will withdraw from the Paris climate accord.”  The article continues stating that: “ His administration will begin negotiations to reenter either the Paris accord or another climate treaty, “on terms that are fair” to the US, Trump added.

“As of today, the US will cease all implementation” of the Paris accord and the “draconian” burdens it mandated, said Trump.

CLICK TO VIEW  - 01JUN2017 : Trump announces US withdrawal from Paris climate change deal.

Meanwhile, at the St. Petersburg Economic Summit being held in Russia,  President Putin commented on the decision by the US to withdraw.   RT reported on June 2nd that:  “  Russian President Vladimir Putin has called for calm in the wake of Donald Trump’s decision to pull the US out of the Paris Agreement, joking that any bad weather encountered around the globe could now be blamed on ‘American imperialism’.

Why such a big issue is being of this, especially at this time, could also be questioned.

Speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), the Russian president said the panic surrounding Trump’s decision has been blown way out of proportion, noting that there is still time before the agreement, which was signed in 2015, goes into effect.

"Don't worry, be happy," Putin said in English.

Putin was also quoted as saying that “This agreement [the Paris Agreement on climate change] has not yet even come in effect. It will come into effect in 2021. So we still have time. If we all work constructively, we can agree on something.  The United States has ratified [this agreement], as I recall, but we [Russia] have not yet.  We haven’t done this because we want to wait until when the rules of allocation of resources, and other technical – but important – issues, are ironed out.   It’s about preventing temperature changes of two degrees,” he reminded the audience, noting that “we here [at the forum] somehow do not yet feel that the temperature is rising.  By the way, we should be grateful to President Trump. In Moscow it’s raining and cold and even, they say, some snow. Now we could blame this all on American imperialism, that it’s all their fault. But we won’t.”

CLICK TO VIEW  - 02JUN2017 : Putin on Paris climate change agreement: ‘Don’t worry, be happy’.

Understanding the full context of the document and what is really being said, therefore is quite important.

CVN has reported previously that the basis for the Paris Accord is to limit carbon dioxide emissions while raising taxes to fight this.

There are many doubts I have about this agreement - the easiest of which to explain is the fact that they are implementing a tax - money that you and I will ultimately have to pay for this illusion of ‘excessive carbon dioxide’.  

My other arguments were these.  Pilita Clark, writing for The Financial Times in December of 2015 reported that the Paris Accord was a document to set standards for limiting carbon emissions.  This was the alleged reason presented to the world when negotiating and conducting these negotiations.

CLICK TO VIEW  - 05DEC2015 Pilita Clark, : COP21: Paris talks agree draft accord to limit carbon emissions.

If we assume for a moment that carbon dioxide is the REAL reason for this agreement - that CO2 is the main source and cause of our alleged global warming, then I have several problems with this.

One - CO2 is necessary for plant growth.  Plants breathe CO2 and exhale oxygen.  Plant life should be thriving if CO2 was increasing.   Plant life however is not increasing.  It is decreasing. More on this later in the newscast.  This leads to my second point.

Two - IF CO2 is the real culprit, then the sources of the problem should have been shut down in this agreement.  The oil companies, the coal companies and the logging companies that destroy the trees and forests that process CO2.

You cannot simply ‘tax’  and legislate a commercial rule while doing nothing about the real sources of the problems.

Three - If people complain about the alleged loss of jobs relating to shutting down these industries... I call BS to this.  We simply have to change the way we live.  The coal, oil and logging industries should be paying for mass plantations of hemp because hemp matures in four months instead of 30-40 years for trees.  Hemp will process more CO2 than trees; hemp cleans the soil, and hemp can be used in all the same ways oil and coal are used.

This is why I believe personally question the intentions behind this accord.

Euronews reported the reaction of the French president to the news of the US pulling out of the agreement:

CLICK TO VIEW  - 02JUN2017 :  > EU leaders warn Trump the Paris climate deal can't be renegotiated.

CLICK TO VIEW  - 01JUN2017 EuroNews via : EU leaders warn Trump the Paris climate deal can't be renegotiated.

You heard Macron say:  “We all share the same responsibility; to make our planet great again.”

This is the great environmental tag line to throw in, and it is used in exactly the same way racism is being used.  One is branded as racist if one speaks against immigration; one is anti-environment if one speaks out against this environmental legislation.   The cabal has very cleverly found ways to turn us against each other.  Within their so-called ‘words of truth’, there is contained all the information that has not been made known to the people of the world, so that they can make a proper, informed  and democratic choice.


In other geopolitical news

It seems that George Soros has come out from hiding long enough to speak at the Brussels economic forum.

According to an article on the EuroNews website on June 1st: “ George Soros has urged the European Union to continue pressing Poland and Hungary to preserve the rule of law.

Speaking at the Brussels Economic Forum, the American billionaire financier said he welcomed the EU’s recent tough words on both countries which critics accuse of being increasingly authoritarian.”

Of course, reading between the lines, most listeners will see the hypocrisy in these words, and this is exactly how members of the global cabal are able to turn the tables against anyone who may represent a potential threat to western hegemony.

The Hungarian government has seemingly been taking steps to distance itself from the influences of Soros, causing Soros to strike back.

In the article, Soros was quoted as saying that: “ I am full of admiration for the courageous way the Hungarian people have resisted the deception and corruption of the mafia state the Orban regime has established.  I’m also encouraged by the energetic way the European institutions have responded to the challenge emanating from Poland and Hungary.”

The article also noted that: “ A Hungarian government spokesman said Soros had a clear political agenda and the organisations funded by him were pursuing this.

Soros also warned the EU that it’s facing an “existential crisis”, saying the bloc should not let protracted BREXIT talks distract it from making vital reforms.”

CLICK TO VIEW  - 01JUN2017 Tokunbo Salako : Soros urges EU to keep Poland and Hungary in democratic check.

Here is where having the power of the media works.  There is some degree of truth in his words.  The EU may very well be facing an existential crisis.  However it is not the same EU that people have been led to believe.  There is the unelected EU corporate institution that is facing an existential crisis, and the governments of both Hungary and Poland have begun challenging this structure.

When Soros, or any major political leader speaks of a ‘country’ or a ‘union’, they are very likely referring to the corporate entity, and not the free entity that people have been led to believe they have.

Interpreting carefully, and learning to ask the very important questions, even when having discussions among friends or colleagues becomes important.

If a colleague were to say that Soros is protecting the EU for example, one may ask:  ‘Which EU is he protecting?’  Of course, the individual will not likely have a clue what was just asked, which is why the individual needs to do more research before blindly defending anything without having fully understood the bigger picture.

Of course, this is what humans have been taught to do, and it is a pattern that we need to observe and shift, if humanity is to build on the momentum for global change that we have been building thus far.

It is also important to remind listeners that commercial admiralty law is not based on real law, dealing with harm to others or property.  It is a system of rules that are subject to interpretation.  When Soros suggests that the EU has to come down hard on Poland and Hungary to ‘preserve the rule of law’, he is attempting to preserve the system of commercial rules, and not preserve true, natural law.

According to the legal-dictionary website, the term ‘rule of law’ suggests the a ruling according to a higher law, whatever that ‘law’ may be.

The website continues:  “The rule of law is an ambiguous term that can mean different things in different contexts. In one context the term means rule according to law. No individual can be ordered by the government to pay civil damages or suffer criminal punishment except in strict accordance with well-established and clearly defined laws and procedures. In a second context the term means rule under law. No branch of government is above the law, and no public official may act arbitrarily or unilaterally outside the law. In a third context the term means rule according to a higher law. No written law may be enforced by the government unless it conforms with certain unwritten, universal principles of fairness, morality, and justice that transcend human legal systems.”

CLICK TO VIEW  - : Defintion for ‘Rule of Law’.

Of course, when the media reports this, most people just assume ‘law is law’ without understanding just how vague commercial law really is.

From the three possible interpretations just given, in which context is Soros speaking when he says ‘rule of law’?

It is my belief that Soros is speaking from the third interpretation, relating to rule according to a higher law.  Most listeners are more than aware that there is some kind of other power, and I am resisting the desire to call it a ‘higher power’, although this is how most humans will perceive it within our global hierarchy.

The website explains the third interpretation this way:  “ A conundrum is presented when the government acts in strict accordance with well-established and clearly defined legal rules and still produces a result that many observers consider unfair or unjust. Before the Civil War, for example, African Americans were systematically deprived of their freedom by carefully written codes that prescribed the rules and regulations between master and slave. Even though these slave codes were often detailed, unambiguous, and made known to the public, government enforcement of them produced negative results.

Do such repugnant laws comport with the rule of law? The answer to this question depends on when and where it is asked. In some countries the political leaders assert that the rule of law has no substantive content. These leaders argue that a government may deprive its citizens of fundamental liberties so long as it does so pursuant to a duly enacted law. At the Nuremberg Trials, some of the political, military, and industrial leaders of Nazi Germany unsuccessfully advanced this argument as a defense to Allied charges that they had committed abominable crimes against European Jews and other minorities during World War II.

In other countries the political leaders assert that all written laws must conform with universal principles of morality, fairness, and justice. These leaders argue that as a necessary corollary to the axiom that "no one is above the law," the rule of law requires that the government treat all persons equally under the law. Yet the right to equal treatment is eviscerated when the government categorically denies a minimal level of respect, dignity, and autonomy to a single class of individuals. These unwritten principles of equality, autonomy, dignity, and respect are said to transcend ordinary written laws that are enacted by government. Sometimes known as Natural Law or higher law theory, such unwritten and universal principles were invoked by the Allied powers during the Nuremberg trials to overcome the defense asserted by the Nazi leaders.”

This is how vague law really is, and thus it is becoming increasingly important to challenge people to explain their definition.  In a legal context, this can be interpreted as a form of determining the jurisdiction.   Once the jurisdiction is known, the appropriate interpretations and arguments can be given, heard, and ruled upon.

As far as I am personally concerned, a commercial rule jurisdiction has no basis for law against humanity.


In financial news,  this will not come as a surprise to many, but it is good news that there are at least some public admissions that crimes are being conducted on numerous levels, particularly within the financial and banking industries.

Over the past two years, we have been hearing about numerous scams, frauds and crimes taking place in the banking industry.

One might expect that this would also be happening within the precious metals markets, and sadly, this would be correct.

An article appearing on on June 2nd has reported that;  “ After months of "smoking guns" and conspiracy theory dismissals, a Singapore-based Deutsche Bank trader (at the center of fraud allegations) finally confirmed (by admitting guilt) what many have suspected - the biggest banks in the world have conspired to rig precious metals markets.

The Deutsche Bank trader, David Liew, pleaded guilty in federal court in Chicago to conspiring to spoof gold, silver, platinum and palladium futures, according to court papers. Bloomberg notes that spoofing involves traders placing orders that they never intend to fill, in an attempt to manipulate the price.”

As the article also notes:  “ This is not the first time Deutsche Bank has been involved, implicated, and exposed to rigging the precious metals markets.

As we noted in December, when we first reported that Deutsche Bank had agreed to settle allegations it had rigged the silver market in exchange for $38 million, we revealed something stunning: "in a curious twist, the settlement letter revealed that the former members of the manipulation cartel have turned on each other", and that Deutsche Bank would provide documents implicating other precious metals riggers. To wit: "In addition to valuable monetary consideration, Deutsche Bank has also agreed to provide cooperation to plaintiffs, including the production of instant messages, and other electronic communications, as part of the settlement. In Plaintiff’s estimation, the cooperation to be provided by Deutsche Bank will substantially assist Plaintiffs in the prosecution of their claims against the non-settling defendants.”

The article offers photos of the text and chat messages of others involved in the rigging.  According to the article:  “traders and submitters were captured coordinating trades in advance of a daily phone call, manipulating the spot market for silver, conspiring to fix the spread on silver offered to customers and using illegal strategies to rig prices.

“Plaintiffs are now able to plead with direct, ‘smoking gun’ evidence,’ including secret electronic chats involving silver traders and submitters across a number of financial institutions, a multi-year, well-coordinated and wide-ranging conspiracy to rig the prices,” the plaintiffs said in their filing.

The Deutsche Bank documents show, among other things, how two UBS traders communicated directly with two Deutsche Bank traders and discussed ways to rig the market. The traders shared customer order-flow information, improperly triggered customer stop-loss orders, and engaged in practices such as spoofing, all meant to destabilize the price of silver ahead of the fix and result in forced selling or buying. It is also what has led on so many occasions to the infamous previous metals "slam", when out of nowhere billions in notional contracts emerge, usually with the intent to sell, to halt any upside moment in the precious metals.”

In conclusion, the article summarizes the following:  “ Liew's admission of guilt to a conspiracy to spoof precious metals markets seems like the final nail in the coffin of any conspiracy theory deniers - theory is now fact once again. The question is - will the regulatory crackdown on these manipulations actually reduce rigging in the markets?”

It may seem that the answer to this question will depend upon whether other, corrupted traders and bankers get scared and stop voluntarily...or whether a new financial paradigm gets implemented and shuts down all ability to rig and control markets.

CLICK TO VIEW  -  02JUN2017 : Deutsche Bank Trader Admits To Rigging Precious Metals Markets.


As briefly mentioned in the lead story, the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum took place from Jun 1-3.  According to the website for SPIEF, the event from last year, 2016,  was described as follows:  “ Over the last 20 years, the Forum has become a leading global platform for representatives of the business community to meet and discuss the key economic issues facing Russia, emerging markets, and the world as a whole.

The St. Petersburg International Economic Forum 2016 was attended by over 12,000 participants from 133 countries, including heads of state and government from emerging economies, heads of major corporations, and the world’s leading experts in the fields of science, the media, and civil society.”

CLICK TO VIEW  - : About the St. Petersburg forum for 2016.

As of airtime, it is unclear how many were in attendance this year, given the current western tensions with Russia.

Skimming through the program for the three days, here are a few selected topics of potential interest that were discussed;









CLICK TO VIEW  - : Day One program at the forum.















CLICK TO VIEW  - : Day Two program at the forum.




CLICK TO VIEW  - : Day Three program at the forum.

There were also sessions that focused exclusively on Russia’s relations with various countries, including France, Germany, Italy, Serbia, Iran, Japan, Sweden, the United States and others, as well the African Union and South America.

Looking through this program, I observe that, despite the western world hegemony attempting to impose and maintain sanctions on Russia, the country is still seeking to reach out in economic and political ways, while also addressing some very key topics for our current period of time.

On day one of the forum, John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hitman, spoke on the topic of Transforming Turmoil, describing the need to develop an economic model to get the world out of the current instability and into the New Economy era.  He was quoted as saying:  We have created a system that can’t go on. We can’t continue digging up the Earth, destroying the air, destroying the climate – there has to be another way.  We have created something that I call a “death economy” – an economy based on destroying resources and exploiting the Earth”

I think corporations in the United States have made a lot of mistakes, I think the government made a lot of mistakes and, instead of doing really good things in the world, they did a lot of exploitation.  CEOs of corporations want to create a better world, but they are afraid to do so because, if they lose a small percentage of their market share, their profits will go down and stakeholders will fire them. So they face a dilemma.

We have seen huge changes in the last five years regarding production of resources. Last year in the US was the first one when production of renewables was greater than that of fossil fuels”

We have created amazing technologies: medicine, art, music, but now we understand that maybe we have gone too far.  It’s time to change and we have reached the point beyond equilibrium. We need to move to a “life economy”, an economy based on cleaning up pollution, regenerating the environment.”

CLICK TO VIEW - : Highlights from presentation given by John Perkins, author of 'Confessions of an Economic Hitman'.

One other seminar, dealing with the emerging cryptocurrencies worldwide. RT reported on this on June 2, Russia’s desire to build a better Bitcoin.  The article writes that: “ The Central Bank of Russia has plans to introduce a national cryptocurrency of its design, according to Deputy Governor Olga Skorobogatova.

"Regulators of all countries have come to the conclusion that it is necessary to do a national virtual currency. This is the future. Each country will decide the issue of a specific time and maturity independently," said Skorobogatova, speaking at St. Petersburg’s Forum.

Skorobogatova said testing of a national virtual currency has already taken place on the Masterchain and Hyperledger platforms. She added that details could be released in two to three years, although I suspect it will be faster than this. The cryptocurrency technology has been supported by Herman Gref, The head of Russia’s largest lender, Sberbank.

CLICK TO VIEW  - 02JUN2017 : Russia wants to build a better bitcoin.

More information on Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies will be coming up on future newscasts, including next week.

This is an event that I would have loved to attend.  There were so many topics of interest, that I would have had a hard time choosing as a journalist which ones to attend.

Of course, without attending, it is impossible to say if the presentations were fair and balanced.  It may seem this way by looking at the program outline...but as listeners know, even the Bilderberg group can design their agenda in such a way to make the people of the world think they are meeting for the benefit of humanity and the planet.  Of course, the main difference is that Bilderberg meets secretly and consists of a very select, invited list of elitists, where this forum is very public and open.


In general news,

As most listeners have come to understand the term ‘government’ or even the term ‘state’ is an institution that operates on the illusion that it serves the will or the interests of those who elected them.  Perhaps in an ideal world, ‘democracy’ might have some real meaning and purpose.

A video that has crossed my path, featuring Larken Rose, describes ‘statism’ as the most dangerous religion.   There are perhaps some, or even many, who may dispute that statement, considering how ‘religion’ is being used at this time to create fear, separation and violence.

CLICK TO VIEW  - Liberty or Death Media via : Statism: The Most Dangerous Religion (feat. Larken Rose).

In the show transcript there will also be a link to a video entitled:  ‘The Story of Your Enslavement’, to share with any whom you feel may be ready for the reality of this particular truth.

Be it ‘statism’ or ‘religion’, it matters not which one is the most dangerous, for in our current reality, both represent a clear and present danger in this current moment of ‘now’ for humanity and our planet, and it is up to those who are ready, willing, awake and aware to step up and answer the call to help co-create the New Earth that so many are now claiming that they desire to experience.

Not in the newscast:

CLICK TO VIEW  - via : The Story of Your Enslavement. (approx 13 minutes )


Over to science and technology-related news now;

CVN has reported in the past on the potential for graphene to contribute in numerous ways to the future of humanity and the planet.

Only recently... allegedly... has graphene’s true potential started to become known. in one article, notes how a new discovery could unlock graphene’s full potential.

CLICK TO VIEW  - : New Discovery Could Unlock Graphene’s Full Potential

Another article reports on how solar cell performance can be enhanced using graphene.

CLICK TO VIEW  - : Solar Cell Performance Boosted Up With Graphene.

A third article reports how graphene could help to solve the world’s water crisis.   Of course, the question always needs to be asked why we are even in a water crisis, and this is because of all the unhealthy and dangerous products created by people who care more about profits, share-holder returns and power over people and the planet.

CLICK TO VIEW  - : Graphene Could Solve the World’s Water Crisis.

The global cabal has become extremely good at creating products, services and crises that require solutions that they and their partners are very happy to provide so-called ‘solutions’ and they make immense profits in the process.

From the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, located in Boston, it is reported that “A team of MIT engineers has successfully designed a new 3-D material with five percent the density of steel and ten times the strength, making it one of the strongest lightweight materials known.”

CLICK TO VIEW  - : MIT Develops 3D Graphene Sponge That Is 10 Times Stronger Than Steel And Ultralight.

CLICK TO VIEW  - 06JAN2017 MIT via : One of the strongest lightweight materials known.

Like hemp, this could radically change the way anything is constructed from cars, to trains to planes and even spacecraft. Place this technology into combination with current alternative energy sources, and it will be a massive improvement.  Combined with free-energy technologies...there will not be many companies operating in the current paradigm, that will be able to survive in their current form with their current products and services.

Supporting videos will be included in show transcript.


A question may be asked in our current reality whether or not we have gone too far too quickly with technology or whether there is another agenda behind the technology that is being made available to humanity?

It might seem that a good argument could be made to support both possibilities.

It has been said that certain groups connected to the global cabal, groups that have been controlling the secrecy of technology - has technology that is consistently 70-100 years ahead of what the public has been given.

In one way, this would be hard to prove conclusively, however, if we look at certain developments, even over the period of the last year or two, such advancements that have been introduced, has to leave a critically-thinking mind with the question as to how long someone has had this technology before it has been rolled out publicly.

When mobile or computer technology is put out in a current version, one can be pretty sure that the company is already working at least two, and very likely even more versions ahead, and they are releasing each version only with enough technology to satisfy the mind-controlled public that there is new technology to buy, that is marketed as a ‘must have’ technology, but not releasing enough technology, so that the company can keep people coming back to buy each follow-up version.

Drone technology started making a public appearance within the public over the last two years or so.  If I was to speculate why this has happened, I would bet that the number of soldier suicides and the number of soldiers that are waking up to the crimes being committed by their respective governments is causing a shortage of soldiers willing to kill on the commands of others, people that they never had any argument with.  In the show transcript, I will offer two such videos to validate this possibility.

Drone and automated technology is rapidly moving forward in the public domain.  Suddenly, it seems that ‘automated cars’, are no longer such a big deal. The technology is moving now into other applications.

A number of articles from the Futuristic News website has focused on this advancing tech trend, and we look at some of the uses for drones and automated technology.  Again, one has to ask the question:  If this technology is being made available now. how many years have people been sitting on this, and in which countries?

The first article from , they report that Amazon has patented an unmanned airship to launch its delivery drones.  According to a photo in the article: “Amazon’s patent describes flying warehouses that are called ‘airborne fulfillment centres’ carried by the giant airships.

Airships could be flown near sporting events or festivals where smaller drones would be released, delivering goods such as food, or souvenirs, to customers below.”

CLICK TO VIEW  - : Amazon Airship: Amazon Patents Unmanned Airship To Launch Its Delivery Drones.

The term ‘airborne fulfillment centres’, at least to me personally, is a rather ominous-sounding name, and makes me wonder if these ships would be fulfilling work for another agenda?

Another article shares how drone technologies can be used for autonomous medical deliveries, or used for rescue missions.


What I find interesting to observe is that whenever there is something that will benefit the public..such as a new underground transportation network,  the government spends millions upon millions doing study after study, to determine things like environmental impact or whatever else.  Given the chemtrail spraying and the water contamination taking place, why would a government care about the environmental impact of a transportation network?

Of course, it is all about wasting taxpayer money, to create more debt, and thus more fear, and thus more control.

A government however will allow huge, wind-turbines, that cause environmental damage through vibration and noise, while killing wildlife, so it looks like the government cares about future energy needs, while investing in technologies that slow down the advancement and release, so it can be profited from.

While automated cars are no big issue anymore, and appear to be accepted as a reality now, it is rapidly moving into other areas.  Google is already using automated cars in some cities.

Transport trucks are now testing automated technologies on long-haul cargo transport routes, for example.  Several trucks have already been revealed showcasing this technology.

In Sweden, Volvo, according to another Futuristic News article,  has pioneered “autonomous, self-driving garbage trucks in the urban environment.’

The article reports that:  “Volvo Group, together with Swedish waste and recycling specialists Renova, is testing a pioneering autonomous refuse truck that has the potential to be used across the urban environment.  The project explores how automation can contribute to enhanced traffic safety, improved working conditions and lower environmental impact.”

CLICK TO VIEW  - : Volvo Pioneers Autonomous, Self-Driving Refuse Truck In The Urban Environment.

Aerospace company Airbus is also taking advantage of the technology.  Another article reports that:  “ During the 87th Geneva International Motor Show, Italdesign and Airbus world-premiered Pop.Up, the first modular, fully electric, zero emission concept vehicle system designed to relieve traffic congestion in crowded megacities. Pop.Up envisages a modular system for multi-modal transportation that makes full use of both ground and airspace.”

CLICK TO VIEW  - : Airbus Self Driving ‘Transformer’ Taxi Can Be Picked Up By A Drone To Fly.

Even tire manufacturing giant Goodyear has been preparing for this day.  Another article is reporting that:  “ The Goodyear Eagle 360 Urban, the first concept tire powered by artificial intelligence, was presented at the Geneva International Motor Show 2017.”  The tires, in theory, allow a vehicle to move in any direction.

CLICK TO VIEW  - : Eagle 360 Urban – Goodyear’s Spherical Tires For Self-Driving Cars.

All of this is just a small sample of what is being made publicly known at this time.

To the average mind, all of this advanced technology, and so much more, will seem exciting.  Of course, it is always exciting to see new technologies coming out that will offer hope within our current world paradigm.

I emphasize the words ‘current world paradigm’.  In a new world paradigm that exists on free energy, and other LIFE-honouring technologies, why would we even need a self-driving garbage truck, for example?

When we start getting excited about new advancements, we also have to start asking the question:  which paradigm is this technology really serving, and is this technology part of a New Earth paradigm that I am choosing to be a part of?

We are being distracted with the excitement of something new, and in the process, one forgets that some of these technologies, such as 5G for example, can be very detrimental and dangerous to humanity and the planet.


Finally, in health-related news,  it is no secret for most as to the dangers of vaccines, and this week, another study affirms those risks and dangers.

An article appearing on the Natural News website on June 1st by Vicky Batts reports the following:  “ A recent study led by researchers from the School of Public Health at Jackson State University has come to some shocking conclusions about vaccinated children. Perhaps one of the most jaw-dropping finds was that vaccinated children exhibited a 420 percent higher incidence of autism when compared to non-vaccinated children — as well as a staggering increased incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) in general.”

The article continues:  “Acclaimed epidemiologist Dr. Anthony Mawson, has authored more than 50 studies and led the astonishing research. In addition to the finding of an overall increased risk of NDD, he and his team also found that there was 420 percent increased risk of both autism and ADHD in vaccinated children. Vaccinated children were also 30 times more likely to have allergic rhinitis and 2.9 times more likely to have eczema than non-vaccinated children. Vaccinated kids also exhibited a staggering 520 percent greater likelihood of having a learning disability.”

Do vaccines really decrease the risk of disease?

According to the article, it seems not. The article shares that:  “ Mawson and his team also examined the risk of so-called “vaccine-preventable” illnesses among vaccinated and unvaccinated children, as well. And what they found was shocking: In most cases, there was no substantial difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated children.”

Essentially, what is being reported is that the risks of harm from the vaccines is not worth it, because the vaccines themselves do very little, if anything, to prevent disease.

In the show transcript, a series of other articles and information will be made available for those wishing to share it with loved ones.

CLICK TO VIEW  - 01JU2017 Vicky Batts, : Autism risk 420% higher in vaccinated children vs. non-vaccinated, published science confirms. - : Journal of Translational Science: Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and

unvaccinated 6- to 12-year-old U.S. children.  {Research Article  doi: 10.15761/JTS.1000186   Volume 3(3): 1-12   ISSN: 2059-268X }


Just to add to the confusion already surrounding the US decision to withdraw from the Paris Accord for climate change, comes this information for consideration.

An article by Mike Adams on the website on June 1 reports that:  “ The primary goal of the Paris Climate Accord — the reduction of atmospheric carbon dioxide — is nothing less than genocide against all plant life across our planet.

That’s because all plants depend on CO2 for their very survival. It’s the “oxygen” for plants, and right now trees, grasses and food crops are starving for CO2 because it sits at nearly the lowest level it has ever been in the history of the Earth.

Humans attempting to eliminate CO2 from the atmosphere is equivalent to some evil, fictional “plant demon” attempting to eliminate oxygen from the atmosphere, causing the mass asphyxiation of the entire human race. Just as eliminating oxygen is genocide against humans, eliminating carbon dioxide is genocide against plants.”

Let me bring this into context for a moment.  What Adams has just reported validates the argument that I made at the beginning of the newscast, about the importance of CO2 to all plant life, and thus also to humanity, because we need the oxygen that plants exhale.   I am a bit surprised that Adams did not make that connection, however.

Therefore, if the agenda of the Accord really is CO2 reduction, then Adams is possibly correct that this represents a threat against humanity.

The news is already getting out that there is an active depopulation agenda underway across our planet.  If one is not able to see this from the chemtrails, the fluoride in the water,  the pesticides from Monsanto and other companies,  the dangerous unhealthy foods and drinks, the vaccines and don’t forget the pharmaceutical drugs, wifi radiation, 5G and more - then someone is so asleep that they are going to have a hard time becoming aware enough to save themselves when the time comes.

Adams continues:  “ Much like everything else pushed by scientifically illiterate bureaucrats and globalists, climate change is a global narrative of the destruction of life. If the climate change terrorists achieve their goals, they will DESTROY the planetary food chain and plunge all life on Earth — including human life — into a mass die-off. Depopulation is the goal, you see. Eliminating CO2 from the atmosphere has always been about destroying human life in order to achieve the population reduction goals openly espoused by every liberal globalist from Bill Gates to Ted Turner.”

CLICK TO VIEW  - 01JUN2017 Mike Adams, : against plants, forests and all life on our planet.

Keeping this in mind, here is where false-flag events become important.  With more and more people waking up and realizing that we have to cooperate on multiple levels, including the energetic, spiritual levels, the global cabal is desperate to keep as many humans as possible from connecting to that power.  Thus the agenda is to also create as much fear and separation as possible.

Although I am in agreement with Adams on the planned agenda, it is my personal feeling that he is speaking from a position of fear, and he seems to lack the more spiritual perspective of the ‘BIGGER, bigger picture’, relating to human evolution on a higher level.

It is important to be aware of this agenda, and what is going on.  I gently but also urgently remind listeners to not fall into the fear of this agenda.

As we evolve, there are going to be huge changes, and with these huge changes, our ways of living as we have previously known them, are going to be radically shaken up, and some of those ways of living will have to disappear, if humanity is to evolve to higher, more LIFE-honouring and LIFE-affirming vibrations.  We are going to have to let go. Some people will do this better than others...but sadly, some of us will not be able to do this at all.

There is no ‘right’, ‘wrong’, ‘good’ or ‘bad’ judgments to be made here.  It is all about what the soul agreed to participate in, for this particular incarnation in physical human form.

May it all unfold as quickly, as easily, as comfortably, as safely and as peacefully as possible for the Highest Good of all, in this time.

 Show summary image


In this week’s FINAL WORDS;

Over the years, since the beginning of CVN, I have been trying to inform, while also empowering, but also gently trying to prepare people for changes that are now becoming more visible and more public.  To some, they may not even realize that massive changes are happening.

Tonight, I would like to share an audio from a video log given by Patricia Cota-Robles.  Some listeners will be very familiar with her work, while there may also be some who do not resonate with it.  Cota-Robles has had her Era Of Peace website and humanitarian organization for an extremely long time.  I met her at one of her events in Lake Louise in the summer of 2008, and I asked her if I could speak for a moment and deliver an apology to the women in attendance and to the women of the world on behalf of the men.  It was a wonderful event, enjoyed by all.

Her video is entitled  ‘An Introduction - New Beginnings’.   In the coming weeks, if I am able to receive permission, perhaps I will be able to share a couple of other meaningful videos, as I am drawn to them.

Create a wonderful week, until our next moment of ‘now’ - I leave you with Patricia Cota-Robles  with ‘An Introduction - New Beginnings’ :

CLICK TO VIEW  - Homepage for Patricia Cota-Robles.

CLICK TO VIEW  -  About Era Of Peace and Patricia Cota-Robles.

CLICK TO VIEW  - : Video Log (VLog) content.


Read 8969 times Last modified on Wednesday, 14 June 2017 20:51
Go To Top